Source: Al-Jazeera Talk
Al-Jazeera is reporting "very low" turnout in the referendum voting so far, especially in Cairo where voting would usually be expected to be high (Kefaya is also reporting weak turnout across the country - though everyone expects a blatantly forged result to be announced). It's worth noting that on a pretty busy news day, with the Arab Foreign Ministers meeting to talk about the Israeli-Palestinian initiative and plenty of other things, al-Jazeera is leading its news with the Egyptian referendum.
A very tired looking Hussein Abd al-Ghani had NDP official Ali Shams al-Din in his studio, where they debated the implications of a 30% turnout; Shams al-Din tried to both contest the low turnout claim and to lower the bar for what would count as high turnout. Expect such arguments to continue. (Al-Arabiya, which I've criticized for not covering the Egyptian events with much enthusiasm, is reporting on it today; I just saw it interviewing a Muslim Brotherhood Member of Parliament who denounced the referendum.)
Most Arab outlets are reporting that Condoleeza Rice softened her criticisms of the referendum after meeting with Mubarak. How humiliating, how predictable. Abou el-Gheit is spooning out the terrorism angle - we must do this to protect ourselves, just as you did with your Patriot Act - and Rice (and at least some of the media) seems to be eating it up whatever the flavor. Yes, how could Egypt possibly fight its great terror menace while judges are supervising elections?
UPDATE: Elevated from comments, report from the ground by our friend Josh Stacher:
I was out and about this morning and afternoon......
Turnout was very low. I think in Cairo we are talking 3-4%. I saw ballot boxes at 12pm that had 7 votes in them (the high might have been 20). The ballot itself was extremely confusing as all 34 amendments were listed - it was 4 pages (both sides) of text with the green 'muwafiq' or black 'gher muwafiq' on the first page.
There were two types of polling stations today. The ones in NDP-strong constituencies (like Sayida Zainab & Fathi Sorour) where the party activists were busy moving people about and doing their spin about terrorism and increasing freedom. In these places, security/police were very relaxed and letting the party play.
Then there were other polling stations such as in Bab al-Sharaaya (Ayman Nour's old consitutency), which despite being in the government's hands since Nov 05, the party is clearly not comfortable. In these stations, security/police were in charge and the NDP seemed absent (no activists or organizers). Those Ligaan were some of the worst managed polling stations I have ever seen in any Egyptian electoral process - in terms of protocol, who was in charge, spin, following the rules, and basic communication.
Also, last night's repression had an effect on Kifaya. They are lucky if there were 40 activists on the steps of the journalist syndicate (hemmed in by CSF). Al-Maseeri (the new head of Kifaya) is a sweet older gentleman but after speaking with him for ten minutes - it is clear neither he nor the movement has a vision or way forward. That was fine two years ago but now it just gives the whole movement of being stale.
The Brothers basic argument today was that they were not protesting because if they did, the government would bring tanks on the street. Perhaps....but I suspect their calculation is that the regime is doing more harm to itself than if group comes out on the streets. Because If they did, it gives the government an excuse to distract attention away from how the whole amendment ordeal has been so blatently rigged. By doing nothing, the MB helps keep the pressure/focus on the state.
Perhaps, I am overanalyzing what was in many many respects a completely average day in Cairo during March. Not that I can prove this but well over 90% of Egyptians seemed to think the Amendment/Referendum process was a joke and it did not matter if they participated or not.
Good stuff from an astute analyst of Egyptian politics. Thanks, Josh.
UPDATE 1:00: With the polls now closed, Al-Jazeera's Hussein Abd al-Ghani has assembled another, very impressive, panel to talk about the referendum - if yesterday's panel had strong NDP representation, this one is tilted more towards critical and independent voices (Abdullah Senawi, Salama Ahmed Salama, Abd al-Monim Said). Al-Jazeera has really done an excellent job with this, turning itself into an Egyptian domestic outlet for large stretches of the referendum and featuring a wide range of voices. But it's not the only media outlet that matters, of course. The liberal columnist Magdi Mohanna, who hosts one of the most influential Egyptian talk shows, had Kefaya's coordinator Abd al-Wahab el-Messiri on yesterday. At least those voices are being heard, despite the official Egyptian media's best efforts.
4:00 .... Everybody is reporting "very low" or "very weak" turnout... right now al-Jazeera reports turnout of 5-7%. According to Al-Arabiya, the Egyptian Organization for Human Rights claims that turnout was about 2-3%, while the NDP is claiming 24-27%. Al-Jazeera just now interviewed various "civil society monitors" and voting station workers saying that nobody came to vote for hours; Hussein Abd al-Ghani presented estimates of turnout ranging from a semi-official 20% to an independent estimate of under 5%. Continuing his outstanding presentation of a wide range of Egyptian views over the last couple of days, Abd al-Ghani currently has in the studio an NDP deputy and the head of the opposition Karama party Hamdin Sabahi, and just took a phone call from a prominent member of the Judges association (which did not oversee the referendum). No word on results (which according to al-Jazeera are due within hours), but reports of fabrications and cheating are already circulating freely.
Final update: the Egyptian government now plans to announce the results tomorrow. It is still claiming the 24-27% turnout I mentioned above, while independent observers are still estimating much lower figures; the claim of 55-60% in some of the more remote districts seems fishy - since those are the ones most likely to be free of pesky independent observers. Al-Jazeera reports observers being driven away from the polling stations by security forces, as well as rumours of ballot boxes being switched... you know, the usual forgery stuff.
Here's a question which I may try to explore more fully tomorrow: what kind of Constitution can be changed by a party line Parliamentary vote followed by a referendum with even a 25% turnout (as per the government's exaggerated claim), much less the more credible 5-10% turnout? Does something changed so easily at the whim of the ruling party even deserve the name "Constitution", at least as conventionally understood by political scientists?
Actually, voter turnout in Cairo is typically extremely low, even by Egyptian standards. Thirty percent turnout for this referendum (of registered voters; most eligible voters aren't registered) would be unbelievably high (literally)!! Govt officials claimed that turnout averaged 23% for the 2005 parliamentary elections...and that was with rich and powerful candidates' patronage/vote-buying/voter mobilization efforts really kicking in and surely inflated numbers. Bottom line: huge legitimacy questions about this process.
Posted by: Amy H | March 26, 2007 at 09:36 AM
Mabye Abd al-Ghani was engaging in some spin, ya'ni - I'm sure just like in primaries here everybody wants to set their own bar...
Posted by: aardvark | March 26, 2007 at 09:53 AM
I was out and about this morning and afternoon......
Turnout was very low. I think in Cairo we are talking 3-4%. I saw ballot boxes at 12pm that had 7 votes in them (the high might have been 20). The ballot itself was extremely confusing as all 34 amendments were listed - it was 4 pages (both sides) of text with the green 'muwafiq' or black 'gher muwafiq' on the first page.
There were two types of polling stations today. The ones in NDP-strong constituencies (like Sayida Zainab & Fathi Sorour) where the party activists were busy moving people about and doing their spin about terrorism and increasing freedom. In these places, security/police were very relaxed and letting the party play.
Then there were other polling stations such as in Bab al-Sharaaya (Ayman Nour's old consitutency), which despite being in the government's hands since Nov 05, the party is clearly not comfortable. In these stations, security/police were in charge and the NDP seemed absent (no activists or organizers). Those Ligaan were some of the worst managed polling stations I have ever seen in any Egyptian electoral process - in terms of protocol, who was in charge, spin, following the rules, and basic communication.
Also, last night's repression had an effect on Kifaya. They are lucky if there were 40 activists on the steps of the journalist syndicate (hemmed in by CSF). Al-Maseeri (the new head of Kifaya) is a sweet older gentleman but after speaking with him for ten minutes - it is clear neither he nor the movement has a vision or way forward. That was fine two years ago but now it just gives the whole movement of being stale.
The Brothers basic argument today was that they were not protesting because if they did, the government would bring tanks on the street. Perhaps....but I suspect their calculation is that the regime is doing more harm to itself than if group comes out on the streets. Because If they did, it gives the government an excuse to distract attention away from how the whole amendment ordeal has been so blatently rigged. By doing nothing, the MB helps keep the pressure/focus on the state.
Perhaps, I am overanalyzing what was in many many respects a completely average day in Cairo during March. Not that I can prove this but well over 90% of Egyptians seemed to think the Amendment/Referendum process was a joke and it did not matter if they participated or not.
Posted by: Josh Stacher | March 26, 2007 at 11:32 AM
I don't understand how such a poor neighborhood like Sayida Zainab is still so pro-government.
Posted by: Abu Muqawama | March 26, 2007 at 03:05 PM
Abu Muqawama,
I think for a very short answer, we could say, "Patronage"....Basically the NDP mobilizes well there because Sorour is the Umda of the neighborhood and he keeps enough people happy.
Just a guess - I am sure there is a much better and more detailed answer out there.
Posted by: JS | March 26, 2007 at 03:11 PM
So...when do the "results" come out? It's nighttime there now. *very curious*
Posted by: Katie | March 26, 2007 at 03:38 PM
The "results" are in, approved with 75.9% of the vote. You can just see the bashas congratulating each other: "Nice work, ya 'amm." "Yes, I though the .9% was a pretty nice touch myself."
Re: Sayyeda Zainab, there were some reports of women being rounded up by NDP people to go and vote, of course without being told what the amendments were about, and they were under the impression that they were "voting for Mubarak." Regime toadies had the nerve to be all self-congratulatory about the "high turnout" and particularly "women coming out to vote."
Posted by: MG | March 27, 2007 at 07:02 AM
Please be aware that the above picture from "Al-Jazeera Talk" was not taken on the day of the referendum. It was previously published in a March 2003 issue of the now defunct "Cairo Times." It is from the protests that broke out on Midan Tahrir following the commencement of the Iraq war.
Posted by: N/A | March 28, 2007 at 07:45 AM