After the failure of the federalism debate in Iraq's Parliament, Kurdish leaders seem to be getting ever more agitated. Both al-Quds al-Arabi and al-Sharq al-Awsat (from opposite ends of the Arab political spectrum) prominently report today that the Kurds have threatened to secede over the question of oil. And it gets worse: Jalal Talabani threated during an interview with American radio (presumably Sawa) that if Syria, Turkey and Iran didn't stop meddling in Iraqi affairs then he would have to retaliate in kind... which, as Abd al-Bari Atwan points out, sounds like exactly the kind of threat to promote Kurdish separatism in those areas most likely to spark fears of a Kurdish secession in those countries. Ill-tempered jockeying as usual, or a preface to a new level of regional tension over the future of Iraqi Kurdistan? With the situation as tense as it is, I'd just say that the risks of brinksmanship right now are kind of high...
The interview was on NPR.
Posted by: Jon Alterman | September 28, 2006 at 09:12 AM
I think it is the Rovian Wedge. Each time there is a sign of rapprochement anywhere, the US administration or one of its people hammers on the issue most likely to divide those groups. Condi actually spelled this out when she told NYT people the current Palestine strategy is to split Hamas between the Gaza and the Damascus people, (over explicit immediate recognition of Israel) because one side is suffering from hunger and the other is not. This was the Israeli strategy in the recent war only there the wedge was bombing and destruction. As for Iraq, I don't think it is entirely right to say the recent Baghdad federalism negotiations "failed". There is a definitive account of the current status of this by Shiite scholar Reidar Visser (available at www.historiae.com/aqalim.asp), and he notes that there were some signs in the recent talks of a rapprochement between the federalism wing of the UIA and a group of "nationalists" (for want of a better term) including Sunnis. Not a bad time to have your main ally throw the thing into confusion by saying he might secede over oil.
It's a way of looking at things. I offer some vignettes from the Arab-language press, some of which seem to be pointing in this direction, at my humble blog http://arablinks.blogspot.com
Posted by: Badger | September 28, 2006 at 01:31 PM
What would you expect? The Turks didn't want the Bush malAdministration invasion of Iraq at all, in large part because of their Kurd problem. It may be likely that the Turks will annex Iraqi Kurdistand (or divide it with Syria and Iran) to put the issue to rest.
Posted by: raj | September 29, 2006 at 12:06 PM