Well, after I wrote that long post yesterday about the relative impact of close-ups versus wide-angles in the coverage of opposition and Hizbollah protests, how is today's big opposition protest being covered? Al Jazeera's running ticker has the exact same language that it had for the Hizbollah protest: "hundreds of thousands." No difference there. It is showing lots of wide angle crowd shots, thereby conferring "Arab street power" credibility on the opposition rally, complying with the Asad/protestor demand to "zoom out", and seemingly invalidating the premise of yesterday's post!
But notice this one screen capture: a protestor carrying the sign "Zoom In: We Are All Lebanese!" Which would support the logic of my post yesterday, while also more directly playing into the opposition theme that the Hizbollah rallies had a lot of Syrians bused in for the occasion.
And check out how al Arabiya (left) and al Jazeera (right) chose to illustrate their Lebanon stories on their websites, as opposed to the TV images captured above - closeup images, with al Arabiya offering a pretty girl and English signs, and al Jazeera offering a crowd whose faces could be easily discerned:
Al Arabiya Al Jazeera
All very interesting... much to think over. The battle to interpret these crowds and their political meaning is only going to get more intense and more important, and it will be interesting to see how it develops. Hazem al Amin has a good piece in al Hayat today proposing Future TV and al Manar (Hizbollah TV) as offering two distinct versions of reality, each with important political implications. Mamoun Fandy has a less good piece in today's al Sharq al Awsat suggesting that the choice is between "Hassan Nasrullah and Ralph Lauren." Much more to come, I have no doubt.
UPDATE: a reader sends in this AP picture, which shows that you can have your cake and eat it too - peanut butter and chocolate - close ups on Lebanese babes and mass crowds!
Clicking through the Yahoo slideshow, I can already predict which photos will be up on the right wing blogs in a matter of hours. Hmmm.... the guys on the construction crane or the girl in shades and red tanktop in front of the "Braveheart" quote? Any guesses? Anyone? Anyone? Bueller? Bueller?
Posted by: Hank Scorpio | March 14, 2005 at 01:56 PM
If both sides keep escalating their protests, how longbefore this breaks out into serious violence? I can't imagine Hezbollah is going to let itself be one-upped like this.
Posted by: HowLong | March 14, 2005 at 01:58 PM
what's that in her shirt?
Posted by: praktike | March 14, 2005 at 02:00 PM
I think the reason right wing bloggers focus on the sexy babes is that at heart many of them are xenophobic. The idea of bringing freedom to people only really appeals to them as long as they like the look of the people -- i.e. if they're sexy looking Lebanese babes.
Posted by: Janak | March 14, 2005 at 02:09 PM
I think it's more a generic Internet dude perviness (clicking on pictures of hot babes being the number one purpose of the Internet) combined with an ignorance of the Middle East in general and Lebanon in particular-- "ohmygod, hit chix! In Lebanon! Who knew?" It's like, yeah, morons, all those Gulf Arabs have been coming to Beirut en masse because they like the shopping. (rolls eyes)
I have a tough time getting too excited by the photos, since they inevitably remind me of my Lebanese cousins and (when she was younger) mom-- and nothing damps the libido quicker than being reminded of one's female relatives.
Posted by: Hank Scorpio | March 14, 2005 at 02:41 PM
I think there is an element of old skool colonial eroticism in the rightwing fascination with Lebanese women. Freedom through the liberation of women and all that...though Lebanese women are pretty liberated.
As a Lebanese male, its hard for me to see what the big deal is. I don't find Lebanese women particularly exotic--more like very high maintenance. Thats why we all marry American women.
Posted by: Hassan | March 14, 2005 at 03:45 PM
They look like the hot Latina babes many Anglos love, as long as they leave their men behind, in the old country.
Colonialism really messes with the libido!
Posted by: NeoDude | March 14, 2005 at 03:54 PM
I'd just refer y'all back to the long discussion thread at the "Cartooning the Revolution" post for more on the "Lebanese girls" question...
http://abuaardvark.typepad.com/abuaardvark/2005/03/cartooning_the_.html
Posted by: the aardvark | March 14, 2005 at 04:35 PM
Yes, the right-wing attention being paid to attractive to Lebanese women is telling, but, if there's any demographic that's actually affected by cute Arabs, it's middle-aged Western women and gays who don't mind being referred to as "bottoms."
Posted by: Jeff | March 14, 2005 at 04:46 PM
Lebanese babes as plugged into Technorati.
Posted by: Pearsall Helms | March 14, 2005 at 06:57 PM
I'm with Helena Cobban, I'm really glad the Lebanese are fighting this out with flags instead of Kalashnikovs. I'm keeping fingers crossed.
Hey Hassan, my Lebanese female cousins tell me it's Lebanese *men* who are high maintenance! And thanks for the phrase "old skool colonial eroticism", it's just the term I was searching for. Although it sounds kinda hip, and as an old skool feminist anti-colonialist, I don't like making those slaverers look hip.
Posted by: Leila | March 14, 2005 at 10:17 PM
Hot Chix:
http://www.corriere.it/gallery/Esteri/2005/03_Marzo/libano2/1/LIBANO9.jpg
http://www.corriere.it/gallery/Esteri/2005/03_Marzo/libano2/1/LIBANO10.jpg
http://www.corriere.it/gallery/Esteri/2005/03_Marzo/libano2/1/LIBANO12.jpg
http://www.corriere.it/gallery/Esteri/2005/03_Marzo/libano2/1/LIBANO14.jpg
P.S. Goodbye liberté, égalité, fraternité. Hello, freedom, truth and sovereignty.
Posted by: Nur al-Cubicle | March 14, 2005 at 11:05 PM
Well, USA TOday used the picture with the huge crowd and the Lebanese babe -- best of both worlds, as it is. I definitely agree that the wingnut fixation on this is somewhat weird and a little perverse at best.
I mean, really, you should show the diversity of the crowrd, which seemed to have all sorts of people rather than focusing on Lebanese babes.
Posted by: erg | March 15, 2005 at 10:21 AM
I had some thoughts reading this at 1 am...But I forgot them after I slept. If I posted, it's gone, which is all for the better because it was fairly stupid.
Commenting while sleepy woulda been a dumb idea. However...
Leila, stop getting so worked up about it.
Sometimes, it's just that you're dealing with 20-something males, and advertisers (and thus media) trying to reach them. I assure you, if Kiev had provided similar pictures, they'd get similar placement.
And, frankly, I'm 21, I'm male, I'm sorry. I have hormones. They attract my eyes to such pictures.
It's not objectification, it's life.
Second...A general thought.
American guys have an aversion to hijab and the like, and I include myself here, probably because it hides the women it covers. (I'm thinking primarily of the abaya and burqa. Simple covering of hair is sort of more normal, except on the young.)
Which is kinda creepy in a gut way. It's like, well...What are you hiding?
Raises the question I heard once in a class of, "Do [Muslims] intend for people to be there, or just shapeless forms?"
A sort of acceptance/denial of humanity question.
Posted by: Penta | March 15, 2005 at 12:23 PM
Ukraine would have been covered in exactly the same way (after all, in football and soccer games, TV cameras do their best to focus in on beautiful girls in the crowds) but for one small little fact that has been forgotten in all of this. It was 20 below in the Ukraine at Christmas, so everyone was bundled up. Springtime in Beirut, however, is absolutely perfect weather. So there you go, there is no colonial angle, no oriental angle, just the fact that most photographers are men (as well as most bloggers), and if you can do your job and oggle at the same time, bonus.
Posted by: tamer | March 15, 2005 at 01:48 PM
Penta, there's a scene in a 1980s Iranian movie whose name escapes me at the moment ... the director was the same one who directed "Kandahar," though.
In any case, a young couple goes to a studio to get their portrait taken. The woman starts to take off the head covering of her abaya, and there's this moment of suspense and ... she's completely bald.
Posted by: praktike | March 15, 2005 at 01:58 PM
Ukraine would have been covered in exactly the same way (after all, in football and soccer games, TV cameras do their best to focus in on beautiful girls in the crowds)
There is a difference between a football game/soccer game, which is a light-hearted sports event and a dead-serious political rally. Otherwise we would compare with the Oscars which show gowns all the time.
but for one small little fact that has been forgotten in all of this. It was 20 below in the Ukraine at Christmas, so everyone was bundled up. Springtime in Beirut, however, is absolutely perfect weather. So there you go, there is no colonial angle, no oriental angle, just the fact that most photographers are men (as well as most bloggers),
I don't remember this type of ogling at any previous major political rally in other countries. Correct me if you can give an example.
Its OK for photographers or bloggers to show pictures of beautiful women. But to focus so heavily on this seems a little perverse to me -- is a woman dressed in a hijab (voluntrarily) not equally deserving of freedom ?
Posted by: Josh | March 15, 2005 at 02:19 PM
Anything that humanises lebanese and Arabs in the eyes of americans is a plus in my book. i would compare this to Magic Johnson's AIDS announcement, it humanized what was otherwise seen as a disease afflicting the "other". Did he deserve such coverage and sympathy because he was an athlete and straight, no, but did good come out of this, yes. By the way,in Beirut, and especially at these demonstrations, the preponderence of non head scarved women would be high, and those in headscarves would be a minority, so these pictures probably capture the scene fairly accurately. This obviously is different in more conservative rural areas and in the South. People focus on what interests them, pretty women, especially where it was thought they did not exist, interests people. If they then learn a little more about that part of the world, it is a plus
Posted by: tamer | March 15, 2005 at 02:52 PM
Anything that humanises lebanese and Arabs in the eyes of americans is a plus in my book.
I don't see how focusing on beautfiul women humanizes Arabs, it dehumanizes them by regarding women as mere sex objects.
By the way,in Beirut, and especially at these demonstrations, the preponderence of non head scarved women would be high, and those in headscarves would be a minority,
When you have 800 K people out, there must be a lot of women with head-scarves, there must be a lot of older women, or even children, no ?
Posted by: Josh | March 15, 2005 at 03:47 PM
A question: would it be more orientalist if you had some sort of hijab fetish?
Posted by: praktike | March 15, 2005 at 04:06 PM
No, it humanizes them by making people over here think, hey I could date that girl, hey she looks like my sister, my neighbor. This is all to the good. by the way, I have seen plenty of pictures of older people and young people as well, as well as, god forbid, men!Sure some of the conservative leaning blogs have been playing up the pretty women angle. My conclusion from reading them is more of an epiphany reached by some people of "wow i did not know there were pretty girls there, girls that look like us, I thought they were all, you know, arabs". I see this as a positive. We objectify women all the time here in the states . If people treated and thought of Arabs in the same way as they thought of Americans, that would be great, including the objectification of women. So people are playing up an angle, but it is not a distortion of what actually took place. Most protestors were young and more "liberal"
Posted by: tamer | March 15, 2005 at 04:26 PM
Praktike: After nasty experiences with Japanese movies subtitled in English (I could barely read the subtitles), I've had a dislike for subtitled movies. Unfortunately, that's most foreign movies.
However, I'll remember that, so thanks.:-)
Otherwise, re your 4:06 PM comment: I dunno.
Josh: Seriously, most people who pick the pictures that run in the US media don't think like that.
This was a serious, yet very happy, story in most US media. So it was looked at very...happily. Which means that if you could go for the shot that combines subject and 'neat-bonus-for-circulation', most media did that.
Which is, frankly, what they usually do in all but dead-serious stories. And, BTW...
Kiev provided damn hot girls, given the weather.:-)
It happens with EVERY time freedom hits.
American college kids get attracted by pictures, go to new places, meet new people, and probably sleep with a few of them. :-P
That's how America found Eastern Europe after 1989, remember.:-P
HowLong asked how until it breaks out into violence, I wonder how long until some band from the US or Europe decides to play the protest circuit in Beirut.
Call me a very mischief-making optimist.
Posted by: Penta | March 15, 2005 at 04:54 PM
Actually, Tymoshenko herself is not exactly ugly.
She also seems well aware of that fact:
http://www.tymoshenko.com.ua/eng/photo/
Posted by: praktike | March 15, 2005 at 05:37 PM
My conclusion from reading them is more of an epiphany reached by some people of "wow i did not know there were pretty girls there, girls that look like us, I thought they were all, you know, arabs"
Well, that could be a positive, but I don't know. If someone is so insular as to not realize that there are pretty Arab women and cute Arab children, then they're probably not likely to have much of an open mind on humanizing Arabs except the pretty girls.
On the other hand, it probably does no harm.
Posted by: Josh | March 15, 2005 at 05:38 PM
Hey, 21 year old guy, you're just going to have to deal with this 42 year old female's take on it. I'm not that worked up, believe me. But I'm also not going to shut up about it because some guy, of whatever age, tells me to. Blog world is heavily male. My point is a minority one. Too bad, I'll make it again when I damned well please.
Posted by: Leila | March 16, 2005 at 02:57 AM