« Drug testing | Main | Comic Book Politics »

February 15, 2004

Comments

Neo-Troll

Thanks...that was sweet.

No Preference

Yes, very well put.

Tom Geraghty

Another thing about the Packer article -- all of the proposals spelled out at the end (sanctions against nations that sponsor terrorism, a "Helsinki Accords" for the Middle East, more support for non-proliferation) seem to be things that just about any Democrat of the last 20 years would easily support.

He doesn't really engage with the question of where and when military force should be used. What are the proposed "rules" about this in a new Democratic foreign policy? He doesn't propose any. Was invading Iraq a good idea or a bad one? He doesn't say.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Blog powered by Typepad
Analytics