« Iraqi document release revisited | Main | Off to Texas »

March 28, 2006

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c391553ef00d8347eeef553ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Radio Sawa or impaired broadcast?:

Comments

Bill

Interesting.

But not as interesting as this, Prof Lynch:

http://www.metimes.com/articles/normal.php?StoryID=20060315-080500-5360r

Strange how you post everything else that quotes you, but you somehow overlooked this one!

lamont cranston

Bill, you idiotic troll, that was discussed in detail here:

http://abuaardvark.typepad.com/abuaardvark/2006/03/s_for_snydetta_1.html

lc

the aardvark

Yeah, I don't think it would have been possible to have discussed, and dissected, Snyder's article more than I did.

upyernoz

isn't the funniest thing the very fact that "radio sawa" can mean "impaired broadcast"?

doesn't that pretty much say it all?

lilbitthunder

excerpt

U.S. military planners assume that Iraq's Republican Guard and the Special Republican Guard that protects President Saddam Hussein will fight. But based on the waves of regular Iraqi soldiers who surrendered during the 1991 Persian Gulf War, they hope to induce as many as possible to do the same again.
"The leaflets, the broadcasts, are to try to get; if there is a conflict; to keep the worst case from happening," Gen. Myers said.
"Apparently they're having some effect," he added, "because we understand the Iraqi regime tells the populace that these leaflets are coated with chemicals and are actually out there picking them up with chemical suits on and gloves."

acually, the document is not reporting propaganda from the US, but that Iraqi propaganda had been exposed, the "rumor" is one they started to keep people from reading the leaflets we wanted them to read, that does make sense

The comments to this entry are closed.

google analytics


Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Blog powered by Typepad