Jordan and jihadi culture
Don't miss Nir Rosen's interesting piece on Abu Musab al-Zarqawi and jihadi culture in Jordan. Some Jordanian bloggers are upset with it, because they think it makes Jordan sound far more dangerous than it really is. I don't want to comment yet on Rosen's article itself, but I did want to mention that it immediately made me think of a fascinating piece I read in al-Hayat last week (February 15; sorry, the URL is all messed up and I can't seem to reproduce it) about booksellers in Amman.
The author, Fedwa al-Dabbagh, surveys a number of booksellers in central Amman and argues that what what people are really buying has very little resemblance to the official line. As she wanders through the markets, the voices of Nancy Ajram and Elissa compete with tapes full of gunshots and explosions and exhortations to join the jihad in Palestine and Iraq. She points out - quite accurately, based on my personal experience - that most of the bookstores' sales are of the "under the counter" variety: jihadi and takfiri texts officially banned, but easily obtainable (Abdullah Azzam remains a particular favorite). For a dinar, she writes, you can easily get videos of bloody attacks against Israel produced by Hamas and Islamic Jihad, or against Americans in Iraq, or beheading videos, or of the devastation of Fallujah in April 2004. That, and pornography.
All of this, it's crucial to note, takes place outside of formal channels, outside the licensed print media or television - more resembling what can be found on the internet than what can be found on al-Jazeera. She interviews one book-seller (Ahmed) who says that more than a year ago the authorities banned him from selling jihadi videos or tapes, and whose stall is the target of frequent raids. Nevertheless, he claims to have daily sales of some 200 JD ($280), primarily from Islamist and jihadi materials. "Enlightened" books don't do very well.
Another more established book-seller says that his clientele is older (over 25) and buys a wider range of books. He mentions "Binat al-Riyadh" (the controversial book about young Saudi women), the Arabic translation of the Da Vinci Code, and Yasri Hussein's "Reason, al-Salafiya, and Freedom" as particular best-sellers. But, he says, since the 2003 Gulf war he has seen much greater acceptance for religious books and books about the last days.
Yet another book-stall operator says that his best sales are of novels and poems (Nizar Qabbani, Amin Malouf) and singers like Nancy Ajram and Amr Diab, as well as preachers like Sami Youssef.
The implication of the article is that the official crackdown on "takfiri thought" by the Jordanian authorities, announced after the November hotel bombings - which mainly concentrates on the official and licensed media - won't accomplish much, since the material still circulates freely in popular markets. The official list of banned books means little, it would seem.
Jordanian readers: does Dabbagh's account of the current state of Amman's booksellers ring true to you? The easy availability of the under the counter stuff, the juxtaposition of Nancy Ajram and Abdullah Azzam - that all fits with my experience in years past, but I wonder if you find that things have changed significantly since November?
dear aa,
the jordanian bloggers are as patriotic as most other bloggers in the mideast - they're not particularly politically mature.
so instead of actually contemplating that, surprise, there are jihadist groups in their own safe & happy place, they immediately go into "don't make my country look bad" mode.
oh well ...
--raf*
www.aqoul.com
Posted by: raf* | February 21, 2006 at 01:29 PM
One minor correction, Sami Youssef is a musician who sings religiously oriented music. Not a preacher.
Otherwise, very interesting.
Posted by: Emad | February 21, 2006 at 03:45 PM
Yes, about Sami Youssef - he was identified in al-Hayat as a preacher, but of course you're right about his music.
Posted by: the aardvark | February 21, 2006 at 04:10 PM
Whoa!!!
Bush Says He Will Veto Any Bill to Stop UAE Port Deal
*Link: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,185479,00.html
Posted by: lj | February 21, 2006 at 06:26 PM
Interesting to find that on the Mental Mayhem blog, the author of the article you mention responds to the criticism. It seems that an overzealous editor altered things in a more sensationalistic manner than even he, the article’s author, intended. He adds a few bits of information that make the piece have a more complete flavor. Ah, the power of the blogosphere:
http://www.natashatynes.com/mental_mayhem/2006/02/author_of_iraqs.html
Raf*, As to the political immaturity of Jordanian bloggers, I think that you should visit itoot, as mentioned here on the Aardvark. Sure there are some immature writers out there. Surprise, some of them might be under the age of 20, so cut them some slack. And remember, there is still a culture of fear in talking about things that just might get you arrested (see editors publishing Prophet cartoons). But in all of that, you'll find some fairly serious and insightful commentary and critique. Try not to broad brush a whole community like you’ve done here. You do yourself and those you tell this a real disservice.
Posted by: The Informer | February 22, 2006 at 12:53 PM
dear "informer",
re: "broad brushing a whole community" - point taken.
i actually am reading itoot, and a fair number of mideast blogs more. i've been part of the mideast blogging community since early 2003 ... so i do have some experience. if you'd've actually visited my blog (or aqoul.com) you'd've known that.
i do NOT think that having a hard time taking criticism of one's own country is rooted in "fear of talking about things that just might get you arrested" - and if you would read mideast blogs then you wouldn't make that statement.
i live in the mashriq - reflective defense of one's own country in the face of outside criticism or "uncovering of negative aspects" is widespread. i don't fault bloggers for that. but i also don't have to accept it.
cheers,
--raf*
Posted by: raf* | February 22, 2006 at 03:32 PM
Raf*, first off, it's unfortunate you can't reply without getting snotty e.g. "if you'd've actually visited my blog (or aqoul.com) you'd've known that." There is no need for such theatrics. Why do I need to go visit your site when you make your argument here? Do I have to reconstruct everything you stand for -- gather up your life's context -- to understand your point? I'd sincerely hope not.
Second, your address of "taking criticism of one's own country" also seems a bit off the mark. That's not what I was addressing in your comment. I was referring to your comment about Jordanian bloggers being politically immature. You'll notice that I preface the comment that you quote with the clause: “As to the political immaturity of Jordanian bloggers...” Please note that such a preface is there to suggest that the following argument will be addressing that particular point. I was not addressing the idea of “taking criticism.” You may tie the two things together. I do not.
The issue I had with your statement was simply your complaint that these bloggers are politically immature. Full stop. You seem to agree that you used too broad a brush on that.
As to reading Mideast blogs, well, thanks for the advice. I've actually been reading and even involved in the creation of a number of aggregate sites for Mideast blogs since the earliest of days. But you don't need to know that to understand my points here. My presence or lack thereof in the scene really is not necessary to grasp my points or for acceptance or rejection of them.
Your final point seems more measured than your initial comment to this post. It is frustrating to see a 'reflexive' defense but then it's difficult to stop a reflex. And I think it'd be a mighty broad brush to think that people should just welcome criticism whole cloth. On an individual basis, most folks don't like to be criticised. That fact carries on when things they believe in or are proud of are put into the fire. Frustrating though it may be, I think it’s not just Mideast or Mashreq or Levant nature, but human nature.
With specific regard to the article in question, much of the response was reflexive. But, thinking of the above, it seems hard to blame so many when Jordan and jihad have gone hand in hand through so many a story thanks to Zarqawi …and others. Some Jordanians are just tired of it and they there’s no reason they shouldn’t be. Who would want such a quick association as that? However, there are more measured analyses of the story within Jordan's budding blogosphere. Those bloggers deserve a bit of notice as well don't you think.
Posted by: The Informer | February 23, 2006 at 11:29 AM
Click Here For HTML Goodies
Yikes: More Than 100 Killed in Iraq Following Mosque Attack
Posted by: lj | February 23, 2006 at 09:17 PM
Army to Reimburse Halliburton for Iraq Work
Check this out in case you did not see it
Posted by: lj | February 27, 2006 at 09:49 PM
Army to Reimburse Halliburton for Iraq Work
Posted by: lj | February 27, 2006 at 09:50 PM
Army to Reimburse Halliburton for Iraq Work
Posted by: lj | February 27, 2006 at 09:50 PM
Did you see this yet
Supreme Court Rules Against Schools in Military Recruiting Case
Posted by: lj | March 06, 2006 at 07:53 PM